Showing posts with label Reuters. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Reuters. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 22, 2008

So, Which Side Is Up? The Side That Has All the Bucks (That Ain't Us, By the Way...)

Hey, “Studio Estimates!” How did you do since Sunday when you prematurely announced, as you do every single week for eons, the box office take for the weekend before a good portion of the country had even prepared to go to the movies that day?

You initially reported that the #1 film, The Forbidden Kingdom with the Chan/Li tandem, had earned 20.9 million dollars. In the final tallies released following the actual weekend, it was reported Kingdom had earned $21.4 million. Well, there’s a half million dollars difference. Where did that come from? If the theatres had already finished their business properly, from which magical realm did all this cash spring? Forgetting Sarah Marshall, reported as having earned $17.3 million by the Reuters story which so incensed me on Sunday, pulled a similar trick to Kingdom’s and tacked on 400 large to its total by the time of the final tallies.

But then there is that completely unnecessary, and for my purposes, troublesome little remake of Prom Night. The Reuters’ piece said that the “teen horror Prom Night slipped to No. 3 with $9.1 million, taking its 10-day haul to $32.6 million.” But when the final total was announced, it’s line read this: “Prom Night, Sony, $8,670,364, 2 Wks. ($32,133,926).” Hmm… somehow, it was slashed of a half million since the story broke. Likewise, Ben Stein’s anti-intelligence, pro-intelligent design screed Expelled lost 300 grand. (Mr. Stein also would have lost his marbles, but those have apparently been missing for a good while.) Were the dollars added to the wrong films? Or was this all just shoddy guesswork?

Of course, it is. That’s why the initial story said “studio estimates.”

My problem, I will reiterate, is that these “studio estimates” are released as the gospel truth, and hours and hours -- and sometimes a full fucking day -- before the true figures are even ready to be stated. Because the headlines tout the news within the story as being finalized figures, one is not supposed to notice the term “studio estimates” within the text. The common person, jumping on the internet 
fleetingly before heading out for a nice Sunday morning (which might possibly include seeing one of the movies involved in the studio estimates) sees the link on their email page or on their phone claiming which movie made the most cash money for the weekend, and since the bulk of people seeing the link won’t click on it, they take only the info in the title out and about with them for the day. “Did you hear that The Forbidden Kingdom is the #1 movie?” And, yes, it happened to be at that moment in time, but the point I am trying to make is that it hadn’t yet earned the money it was being touted as making. But the story is meant to convince you it has.

And I hadn’t even gone yet that day. And perhaps some of you hadn’t either. Maybe we saw the film in another dimension where we only paid with Monopoly money, so it didn't count.

Sunday, April 20, 2008

In Which I Have the Worst Case of Morning B.O. (Box Office) Ever

At 12:42 p.m. today (this would be Pacific Standard Time, or PST to those unable to read, or PT to those who are even worse readers than those unable to read), I noticed a link on my Gmail page that alerted me to a story on Yahoo which announced the weekend's box office report from a story reported on another site. This greatly confused me, since it was barely after noon, box offices had only been open in the most populous state in the union for two hours (if that), and I had yet to go see The Forbidden Kingdom that afternoon.

Mostly out of confusion, I clicked on the link. Indeed, it took me to a Yahoo page featuring that very story, itself spewed out by Reuters, the financial news network based in London. The story told me it had been placed "two hours and 6 minutes ago," which in my time would have been 10:36 a.m., just after most of the box offices had opened here, but in England, would have actually been 8 hours the other way, or this evening.

The story reported that The Forbidden Kingdom, featuring Jet Li and Jackie Chan, had conquered the weekend's box office totals over the three days with 20.9 million dollars, and further reported that Forgetting Sarah Marshall came in second with $17.3 million. And then it went on blah blah blah about disappointing returns over last year's grosses, blah blah blah, last week's champion dropping to third, blah blah blah, Ben Stein's idiot parade about creationism coming in 10th, blah blah... blather. The usual box office hooey...

Now, this Reuters story actually creeped in from L.A., but it really doesn't matter to me. What does matter is that today was NOT DONE. I believe, where I live, that the day was just getting underway here. Most of the movies in the -- start here -- West Coast still had anywhere from three to four showings to go on each screen on which they were to run -- this would be California (#1 most populous state), Washington (#13) and Oregon. Count in Hawaii and Alaska in that mix, and then zip back right across the country to all of the states who were still proceeding with the bulk of their prime viewing hours, and it becomes quite clear that this box office report is nothing but an estimate, and not a real figure. Because, for the entire country, people were still lining up for movies at every single theatre.

BECAUSE THIS "THREE-DAY OPENING WEEKEND" OF THEIRS WAS NOT EVEN CLOSE TO BEING OVER, GODDAMNIT!!!

People, I beg of you. Don't let box office monetary reports help you to decide what movies you want to see. Movies shouldn't be about seeing what is popular. They should be about seeing a decent film. I understand if all of your friends want to see a film, and that makes you want to see it too. After all, they are your friends for a reason. You have common interests, and you generally have a feel for bullshit when one of your friends is throwing it out. It just shouldn't matter to the common person how much money a particular movie has made. If you have stakes in hoping for a sequel, sure, you might care. (That also generally makes you an uncritical pussy from the outset, but that's O.K. Be who you have to be...) Or you just might have horrible taste. Regardless, your world doesn't live and die if a movie makes $20 million at the box office. It might to certain people in Hollywood, and that is where I get confused about this whole subset of the game. This bothered me in Alaska, because I would be heading to a film on a Sunday and already hear that my money had been counted on the news. But, now it really fucking bothers me in California.

Why? Because this is where the movies are mostly made. Isn't it strange in a company town like L.A. that you can catch the news on a Sunday morning, expecting to hear how your film performed from Friday-to-Sunday, when Sunday hasn't fucking happened yet? Well, no, apparently to people here, it isn't strange, because all of this hooey is based around the term "studio estimates." And the studios are right here, for the most part. These are not real figures. They are made-up figures. And studios will argue, argue, argue these figures sometimes, but somehow, come Monday, they will all somehow agree on them for the most part. And it's all so, so serious, becomes it comes down to stocks, and it comes around to shares going up and down with the various companies involved, and it actually does affect tons of people in the long run.

And they are all so anxious to get their answer, like the rest of this increasingly impatient society that they have to be so condescending to their audience that they release news reports telling you that they have pocketed your money before you have even spent it. Or even decided to spend it. Is it just more evidence of the Illuminati and how all of your decisions have been made for you? I don't care. I have a stupid movie to attend so that I can pony up bucks that I apparently owe Hollywood now.

The 50 Something or Other Songs of 2017: Part 2

In our last exciting episode, I reviewed tracks 50 through 31 on Rolling Stone's list of the Best 50 Songs of 2017 . How did those ...