Showing posts with label nightclubs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label nightclubs. Show all posts

Saturday, May 14, 2016

What's Up, Docs?: Twisted Foxcatchin' Sister and Mister

We Are Twisted Fucking Sister (2014)
Dir.: Andrew Horn
Cinema 4 Rating: 7/9

In the last installment of What's Up, Docs?, I lamented the fact that an HBO documentary about Kareem Abdul-Jabbar -- Kareem: Minority of One -- however excellently done throughout, ended its story too early in his life. I knew the subject's story up to the point of the film's conclusion, and I wanted to know far more about what Kareem has been up to in the years since he stopped being in the spotlight of everyday professional basketball life. For me, Kareem had all but disappeared, and I would only see him in fleeting cameo appearances on shows like The Colbert Report. For a man who writes books, makes music, and seems to have a flourishing artistic and spiritual life, this seemed a mistake to me. The film largely skipped over the many years since his retirement, and I felt this was a mistake in letting the viewer get to know its subject more intimately.

And now we come to the opposite case: We Are Twisted Fucking Sister, a documentary about the flamboyantly attired heavy metal band that dominated MTV in its early days. Everybody knows We're Not Gonna Take It and a good chunk of that "everybody" probably still remembers I Wanna Rock, their other major hit. Twisted Sister broke up for many years, but picked the guitars up again in the 21st century, still touring and rocking and smearing makeup on their faces. Lead singer Dee Snider often makes the news with outrageous statements or when he takes stands on various issues, and the band continues apace with most of their most famous lineup intact.

But I knew nothing about the band before they made it big. While I am certainly within the proper age range for the Twisted Sister fanbase, I was on the complete other side of the country in their club touring days, and never heard of them at all until MTV blew them up for the world. And their music was never really for me anyway. I ran through a short metal phase in about the same amount of time as my disco phase (which included zero dancing, just a brief like of the music in my tween years). I never discounted metal, and have many bands in the genre that I appreciate, but it was more in line with my general interest in rock overall, which takes in every genre and every shtick equally.

Now, I will admit to one thing about Twisted Sister that I truly love. I am a big fan of We're Not Gonna Take It, their most iconic song and their biggest hit. For me, the song is a distillation of every component that made for some of the greatest songs of The Who, and it is not hard for me to connect Dee Snider's wailing growl of the song's lyrics with those of Roger Daltrey in his youthful heyday. (Hell, the song even has a completely Xeroxed title from a song off of Tommy, even if the intent of the songs are dramatically different.) Snider thumbs his nose at society and its hangups with exactly the right combination of disdain and satiric purpose, and the taunting guitar solo at the song's center serves to back up his points. While I may have never become an actual "fan" of Twisted Sister, nor did I ever buy any of their records in the '80s, I will never deny that I (not so secretly) love We're Not Gonna Take It. As a document of its time, and even as a bona fide rock classic, I think the song still has what it takes. (I even think the video is still quite entertaining and holds up pretty well too.) And I always sing along when it comes on the radio.

Andrew Horn's documentary on the band is fully cognizant that we know who Twisted Sister is by this point, and that we know their biggest hits without ever having to really bring them up in a 135-minute film about the band. Yes, We Are Twisted Fucking Sister is quite long for what many might initially perceive as being a film about a not especially intriguing subject, especially when you consider that the story cuts off at the point that they get their big record deal with Atlantic Records and finally start getting promoted the way they believe they should have during their long tenure in the New York City area club scene.

The story starts off in typical film bio fashion with a recounting of how the band started, sans Snider, with original member Jay Jay French both running and managing the band. Like many bands that have lasted far beyond the time they probably should have, Twisted Sister had a revolving door that saw numerous permutations of the group come and go like clockwork, until finally settling upon the core that would lead to their success. It is well over an hour into the film before the fifth member of this core, drummer A.J. Pero (who died a few years ago) even gets mentioned, so you can see that director Horn was really intent on telling as much of their early story as possible, and never really worried about getting the whole story into the film.

And this is what fascinated me about We Are Twisted Fucking Sister. In most documentaries about a particular artist or band, you kind of glide through the early content until you finally arrive at what you would consider the meat of the story: when the hero makes it big, the bucks are there, and the party and success is nonstop for many year. You then ride that gravy train until the inevitable point where either there is a gradual easing into middle or older age, or there is some tragic circumstances looming for the subject that stops the party cold. In this film, the early years of struggle and frustration, of filling giant halls with sold out shows but receiving little to no support from producers and record companies, of being perceived as faddish or silly because of their stage antics, is the story. Horn knows we know Twisted Sister; he is fascinated with how they got to be Twisted Sister.


I have to admit, I found all of the club stories and the series of bizarre incidents that briefly forestalled their careers and the battles with record company heads too much fun. I loved the footage of their stage shows in dark, sweaty clubs in the late '70s, and hearing them pump out old Lou Reed and Judas Priest songs was pretty cool. The story (and footage) of their early British TV appearance where Snider brings Lemmy Kilmister and Brian Robinson of Motörhead onstage was also a highlight, and brings a unifying moment to their struggles over the years. The documentary only mentions their success in a tag at the end, and declares that it is "a story for another movie". If Horn intends to make a follow-up, I have no way of knowing, but I would certainly watch it after having seen this one.

I am unsure from the way that they talk about each other during their individual interview segments whether French and Snider are actually friends by this point -- they don't exactly rip each other, but it seems they have their differences -- but something has kept them together all of these years. It's probably the money, but if it's just the rock 'n' roll, then that's good enough for me.


Team Foxcatcher (2016)
Dir.: Jon Greenhalgh
Cinema 4 Rating: 7/9

I think that the major failing of the film Foxcatcher -- as good as I thought it was when it came out -- is that nose on Steve Carell. In trying to approximate the schnoz of murderous philanthropist John Eleuthère Du Pont, the filmmakers gave me a focal point I couldn't get past. No matter how terse the drama around the characters, and the fine acting of all involved, including the Oscar-nominated Carell, the fact is that the nose was just too much of a character of its own in the finished film; the way it added to Du Pont's thousand-yard stare, and the way it caused Carell to breathe through his mouth oddly. The entire time I was watching Foxcatcher, I kept telling myself, "Wow... Carell is really trying to disappear into this role," when the truth is that he really hadn't. His false nose, while done excellently on a technical level, had taken over the film, in much the same way that Nicole Kidman's did in The Hours.

Looking past the surface, the real truth is that John Du Pont was simply a weird guy. Yes, he had a nose that jutted out like his face like a patrician sculpture, but it wasn't that strange of a nose. It did give him an odd look, but in reviewing home movies and news footage of his philanthropic activities, what comes across more is the distant look in his eyes that never seems to really connect with anyone in the room, and that serves to make him seem like he is thinking of twelve other things that have nothing whatsoever to do with anyone around him. 

By most accounts, Du Pont was a lonely soul, who found friendship through his sports-related concerns, including building a training facility for amateur wrestling that would determine the course of his later life in tragic ways. He longed to be a successful athlete on his own terms, but what those terms were seemed to bend with the way in which others either treated him or were accepted by him, or with how far they would allow him to display his increasingly erratic behavior. That he was paranoid to a major fault is without a doubt, but how can one not be so when you don't really know if people like you or not? And when you are the one holding up the checkbook?

In Team Foxcatcher, a new Netflix documentary, the intent seems to be to tell the full story of Du Pont and the events that lead up to his eventual 1996 murder of Olympic champion wrestler Dave Schultz, whom he had befriended and brought to Foxcatcher Farms to train and coach the future stars of American wrestling. Not just American wrestling; he also had a deep fascination with a Bulgarian wrestler named Valentin Dimitrov; so deep that Du Pont (of reliably French lineage) proclaimed that he was actually Bulgarian at a certain point, when there is not a lick of proof that he was. But despite his, er, let's call them dalliances, with various wrestlers over the years, at the center of the story is his seemingly solid friendship with Schultz, a gold medal winner who came to live with his family at Foxcatcher with tragic results. 

The documentary downplays the angle involving Dave's younger brother, Mark (shown as the solid third point on the triangle in the film version), and concentrates more on the background and character of Du Pont himself: his mistrust of others, his isolation from the world on a two thousand acre paradise where he pretty much had carte blanche to operate any way he saw it, and the various characters who spun in and out of his circle. We also come to know Schultz's wife and children, all now grown, and hear their tales of living on the Farm around this oddball king of their world. 

The most fascinating part was the reaction of one of Schultz's daughters, who shows remarkable empathy for Du Pont after he died in prison in 2010 from chronic pulmonary disease, lamenting the fact that Du Pont died so alone in the world, even after murdering her father. It added an angle that I had not considered, that even in tales that have become so well documented as the Team Foxcatcher murder, we still might not understand fully all of the motives of the parties concerned or what drove them to their tragic ends.

Wednesday, September 30, 2015

Recently Rated Movies: Catching Up with Christopher Lee (the actor, not my brother…) Pt. 6

The Resident (2011)
Dir: Antti Jokinen
TC4P Rating: 5

I know Hilary Swank likes to work, but why The Resident? Isn't there something more noble she could do with her time? Isn't there a stern, hardheaded frontierswoman that needs to be portrayed somewhere? Yeah, I know she started out in the original film version of Buffy, but you just don't think of her in this genre. Not that it is a bad thing to have her in something horror-oriented, but I cannot imagine what would have attracted her to the job except a sizable paycheck. 

The Resident is product, cut and dried. Mostly dried, because it is as rote and numb as a stalker film can be. From its case, to its DVD label, to its trailer, to its DVD menu. Every move telegraphed, every camera angle expected, every emotion cut out with the rest of the cookies. The poster I show at the right has one big head (Swank's), and I chose this one over the other one with two big heads (Swank's and co-star Jeffrey Dean Morgan, who is fairly effective as her sweaty lover/antagonist). I did this to downplay to you, the reader, that you are going to look at a review about an edit-by-numbers feature, otherwise you might not stop by. Two heads: Too obvious. Must automatically be a dull, shitty movie. One head: Mmmm, maybe there is something more to this... nope, dull, shitty movie.

Christopher Lee's part in The Resident is the best thing in the film. He gets to be pretty creepy as Morgan's truly terrible, haranguing grandfather. It is not a surprise that something awful will happen to him eventually. Maybe working with Lee was the reason Swank did the film, but I am going to doubt she really knew much about him. Maybe working with the resurgent Hammer Studios was an attraction? I doubt that too, though they may have thrown some money her way to get a big name star for one of their comeback features. I just it would have been for something more fun-sounding like, say, Amelia Earhart: Gremlin Hunter.


Dark Places (1973)
Dir: Don Sharp
TC4P Rating: 5

An interesting thing (well, I find it interesting) happened to me while I was preparing my capsule for Dark Places, a typically well-mannered British horror film from the mid-1970s. I had worked up the first two paragraphs of what I thought was a solid short review, when I changed my mind. The cranial swerve engaged because, in the middle of the third paragraph, I went back to watch a couple of sections of the film a second time, as I wanted to make sure I had some details correct in my head. It struck me quite suddenly that this was the not the film that I was writing about earlier. Yes, it was the same film, but perhaps due to being tired or bored with the thing at the time I first viewed it, I had somehow burned the wrong remembrance of it into my brain. I also blame the several days delay between the viewing and the writing of the review. Thus, I ended up backtracking and watching the entire thing again.

In my original version, I was firm on the point that my chief problem with the film was the dual lead performance of veteran character actor, Robert Hardy. I had worked up details on my early exposure to him as Siegfried Farnon on All Creatures Great and Small in my teenage years, and how I have indeed enjoyed him in numerous parts ever since. And then I declared that despite the fact that I did like him, Hardy often comes off as too stagy for me. I reasoned that perhaps when the part was cheesy enough, he felt the need to serve a little extra ham with it, in a way that you could often get away with it on the boards, but rarely without notice on the screen.

But on the second watch, I settled into his performance, and I realized that the fault was mine entirely. Hardy was playing it as he needed to and I was the one who was approaching it with a jaundiced and incorrect viewpoint. I suddenly noticed that he actually introduced some nice subtle character differences between the psychological breakdown his main character is experiencing in the film and the raving, murderous lunacy off his secondary role. Because of my haste in getting through the film, I almost missed what is actually a decent performance.

Outside of this, the story is not particularly thrilling (heir to an estate returns home while various vultures roam about trying to locate some lost suitcases full of cash), but Dark Places has a bit of spookiness at play in its isolated country estate main setting, and it is chockablock with the sort of actors who generally make these sort of affairs so enjoyable; chiefly, notable British ones. Christopher Lee and Joan Collins (both at home here) are a kinky pair of scheming siblings who are trying to locate the money, as is the dependable Herbert Lom, downplaying his notorious scene-swiping and coming off very effectively. Jane Birkin is lovely in a small, undemanding role. Finally, a favorite of mine from childhood, Jean Marsh, gets to engage in some fantastic histrionics while she displays, in separate scenes, precisely how not to clear a large dining table and how not to keep your husband’s attentions from straying in the bedroom.

As for the horror bits, they are for the most part a little too understated for my tastes, but there is at least one good bloody reveal that works well, and there is a pretty memorable pickaxe scene that I enjoyed even more on the second go. And if you want to annoy me to Hades, add little giggling towheaded brats to your cast, and then punctuate their appearance by employing their disembodied giggles and voices on the soundtrack as added torment. I will wish the worst murder on them from the second they appear on the screen. (Just don’t renege on the promise of this.)

I am not afraid to switch directions on a review, or reverse my opinion altogether if I see a movie anew and leave the screen with a different take on it. But, even after my turnabout on Hardy’s performance, this was the first time that I was thinking noticeably different about a film but still came away wanting to give it the same exact rating as I had planned to give it. While there is much to recommend within the frames of Dark Places, I just couldn’t come around to moving it up to my “generally good” rating (a "6"). It has all that stuff you like in British horror from the 1970s, except that the results are more middling than anything. But I did end up accepting Robert Hardy in it.


Too Hot to Handle (1960) [aka Playgirl After Dark]
Dir: Terence Young
TC4P Rating: 5

I am not a Jayne Mansfield fan. As far as potentially unhealthy obsessions with dead blonde movie stars from the ‘50s go, I am solidly in the Marilyn Monroe camp. (And I actually got over her a good while ago.) But with Jayne, I find little about her that fascinates me. She has her defenders (every “star" does) and I am totally fine with that. She just has never done it for me. I have always seen her more as a gimmick than an actress. Director Frank Tashlin knew just how to walk that line with her, employing her talents effectively in The Girl Can’t Help It and Will Success Spoil Rock Hunter?, films that are in my personal canon.

Jayne has the lead role in Playgirl After Dark, which can be found online in various places as Too Hot to Handle, but the film is not really about her. It’s a tough little British gangster pic, and the plot revolves chiefly around a “key” club owner, Johnny Solo (yeah, that’s his name), in London who runs afoul of another club owner, and decides to fight back against the protection racket. Mansfield plays his stripper/performer girlfriend named Midnight Franklin, and Jayne gets several opportunities onstage during the film to let the girls breathe.

In the mix is the real reason I watched this film, Christopher Lee, as Johnny Solo’s duplicitous right hand thug, Novak. It’s a small role, but Lee’s presence adds a lot to the film. Also here is Barbara Windsor as a newly hired blonde stripper named Pony Tail. She is also a tad bit underage, so I wonder if that will add anything to the plot? Oops! I recently got to see the chipper Windsor in a couple of Carry On films (her inclusion here and her inclusion there will tell you something of her looks) on TCM, so it was a pleasant surprise to see her show up in this.

Playgirl After Dark is a bit too monotonously talky for a gangster flick, and it is not particularly well-filmed. That said, for a low-budget crime piece, it does move along well, the plot is fairly engaging, and the stage performances and the OK songs break things up nicely. I prefer some of the other performers to Jayne, but that is just me. Must be the non-fan in me.

The 50 Something or Other Songs of 2017: Part 2

In our last exciting episode, I reviewed tracks 50 through 31 on Rolling Stone's list of the Best 50 Songs of 2017 . How did those ...